Go deeper in the Peptide Prime app

Create your free account for peptide profiles, dosing tools, protocol tracking, and community insights.

16Days01Hrs32Mins57Secs

PubMed-backed · Instagram, TikTok, X & Reddit · Free to try

Fact-check any peptide claim on social

How it works

Paste an Instagram, TikTok, X, or Reddit link — we extract every peptide claim and score it against real published science.

  • 1 — Paste a link or caption

    Works with Instagram, TikTok, X, and Reddit posts.

  • 2 — We extract peptide claims

  • 3 — Cross-check 4 scientific databases

    PubMed / MEDLINE, Europe PMC, Semantic Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

  • 4 — Get a shareable verdict report

    Free to try · No account required · Results are public & shareable

    Run an audit

Where we source evidence

PubMed / MEDLINE — 35M+ biomedical articles. Europe PMC — Preprints + open access. Semantic Scholar — AI academic graph. ClinicalTrials.gov — Human trial registry.

Peptide Prime app artwork

Claim-level grades — not character judgments

Creators we've audited

Browse evidence grades, claim charts, and full audit history by account

  • @drjessemorse12 audits · 53 claims · evidence score 75

    view audits

  • @drtrevorbachmeyer9 audits · 38 claims · evidence score 38

    view audits

  • @lydiathurstan.ifbbpro6 audits · 29 claims · evidence score 66

    view audits

  • @darkperformancesystems6 audits · 8 claims · evidence score 63

    view audits

  • @hubermanlabAndrew Huberman · Science podcast — peptide explainers · 5 audits · 22 claims · evidence score 75

    view audits

  • @jackiebrenner5 audits · 18 claims · evidence score 42

    view audits

  • @marksmellybellMark Bell · Powerlifting / TRT / peptides · 3 audits · 14 claims · evidence score 29

    view audits

  • @moreplatesmoredatesDerek (More Plates More Dates) · Fitness / literature deep-dives / Marek Health · 2 audits · 8 claims · evidence score 88

    view audits

80 audits

Audit log

Audits are for educational purposes only. Not medical advice. Science evolves — always check citation dates.

Audit 12 of 80

@drtrevorbachmeyer

Verdict summary:

The foundational mechanistic claims (CJC-1295 as a signaling peptide, half-life profiles, and Ipamorelin's selectivity) are supported by pharmacology literature and align with known GH secretagogue physiology.

Verdict:
⚠️ Overstated
Posted:
9 months ago

What the evidence shows:

  • However, the specific quantitative claims — particularly the 2x–10x IGF-1 fold-change trajectory and the assertion that CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin 'restores the GH axis to age 25' — exceed what is explicitly documented in published human trials.
  • The Teichman et al. (2006) Phase 2 study confirms CJC-1295 DAC elevates IGF-1 sustainably, validating the direction; but the granular quantitative claims represent creator interpretation rather than direct study findings.
Peptide Prime app artwork

Conclusion:

The combination claim lacks cited peer-reviewed support and overstates the evidence base for 'youthful restoration.'

Full audit history for @drtrevorbachmeyer

Audit 21 of 80

@hubermanlab

Verdict summary:

Five of six claims are well-supported by credible scientific evidence.

Verdict:
✅ Supported
Posted:
over 2 years ago

What the evidence shows:

  • GLP-1 agonists, insulin, oxytocin, and BPC-157's roles in their respective domains are grounded in human trials or robust preclinical consensus.
  • Sermorelin's mechanism and clinical use are real, but the FDA indication claim is slightly overstated—sermorelin treats growth hormone deficiency (in which short stature is a symptom), not short stature as an independent indication.
Peptide Prime app artwork

Conclusion:

No claims are actively contradicted by the evidence; the evidence tier varies appropriately (human trials for GLP-1; preclinical for BPC-157; foundational biochemistry for insulin and oxytocin).

Full audit history for @hubermanlab

Audit 68 of 80

@drjessemorse

Verdict summary:

This post lists BPC-157 among “9 supplements confirmed to help Detox from the COVID Spike Protein.”

Verdict:
❌ No Evidence
Posted:
about 2 years ago

What the evidence shows:

  • No published research supports BPC-157 as a spike-protein detox agent.
Peptide Prime app artwork

Conclusion:

Preclinical BPC-157 literature on tissue repair does not establish this specific claim, so it is graded No Evidence rather than a milder Overstated.

Full audit history for @drjessemorse

Claim-level grades,not character judgments.

Peptide Prime app artwork
Peptide Prime app artwork
  • Supported
  • Overstated
  • Misleading
  • No Evidence
There's more to explore in Peptide Prime
Get the app